KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Computer Based Host? Better Read This.... Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Thu May 02, 2024 8:16 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:36 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
Great article but the proff will be in the pudding if they defend a host pro bono.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:58 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:43 pm
Posts: 6784
Location: Fort Collins Colorado USA
Been Liked: 5 times
This would not be a routine arrest based upon heresay or suspicion. A copyright arrest would be proceeded by months of investigation and many thousand dollars spent.

This is not a simple civil matter that anyone can walk up and question your legality. If so it would have to be a federal official charged with copyright enforcement.

link

_________________
Join The Karaokle Singers Social Network. Upload Your Music!!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:27 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:34 pm
Posts: 3616
Location: Toronto Canada
Been Liked: 146 times
mckyj57 @ Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:43 pm wrote:
Well if you are a format-shifting computer user, and happen to be in the first few hundred that get popped before the furor starts, then that's unlucky. Until then, I wouldn't worry much.

And looks like the OP has succeeded in getting this topic stirred up with a nothing first post. He do hate computers.


What is format shifting?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:28 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am
Posts: 1832
Location: TX
Been Liked: 59 times
Me thinks some people have been in the cold weather too long and need summer to come quickly :lol:

If I had illegal material on my external hard drive and thought that some guy was going to take it so they could file suit against me somehow that hard drive would go flying across the room and end up in a million pieces and I keep no music on my computer so they would find very little. Yea yea alright they could take the disc out and see if there was illegal music on it but I'm sure a good Lawyer would say "Oh you put that disc in a different computer hmmm sounds like you may have tampered with evidence to me"

I think that there are a lot of scare tactics going on and the only way you should be worried is if you are blatantly breaking the law. If you think that I'm going to carry hundreds of discs around with me just to prove I have them your nuts :shock:

If they want to see them they can get a warrant to come to my house or make me produce them. I really don't think that some dude is going to stop your show so he can look through all your discs (if you carry them with you) to see whats legal and whats not and as Joe put it coping is legal as long as you own the original disc.

Lone Wolf

_________________
I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS!
A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:31 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:34 pm
Posts: 3616
Location: Toronto Canada
Been Liked: 146 times
mckyj57 @ Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:43 pm wrote:
Well if you are a format-shifting computer user, and happen to be in the first few hundred that get popped before the furor starts, then that's unlucky. Until then, I wouldn't worry much.

And looks like the OP has succeeded in getting this topic stirred up with a nothing first post. He do hate computers.


Ok, after reading kk's link, I now know what the shift is. It is changing the format of the song from disk to digital.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:08 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22975
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
ripman8 @ Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:27 pm wrote:
mckyj57 @ Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:43 pm wrote:
Well if you are a format-shifting computer user, and happen to be in the first few hundred that get popped before the furor starts, then that's unlucky. Until then, I wouldn't worry much.

And looks like the OP has succeeded in getting this topic stirred up with a nothing first post. He do hate computers.


What is format shifting?


Ripping your discs to & using a computer format instead of the actual disc.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:50 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:57 pm
Posts: 514
Location: Watertown WI
Been Liked: 0 time
Im shocked that it never seems to come up that MOST karaoke is illegal anyways. as i understand it MANY manus have gone without paying all or some of the fees they owed. oooh but im sure none of us have any of those disks do we?

_________________
the voices arent real, but they have some good ideas


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:09 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22975
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
supercharged @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:50 am wrote:
Im shocked that it never seems to come up that MOST karaoke is illegal anyways. as i understand it MANY manus have gone without paying all or some of the fees they owed. oooh but im sure none of us have any of those disks do we?


Doesn't matter on our end, as long as the clubs are paying the ASCAP/BMI fees, doesn't matter that the manus didn't properly license their end.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:51 pm 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:27 am
Posts: 2444
Been Liked: 46 times
supercharged @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:50 am wrote:
Im shocked that it never seems to come up that MOST karaoke is illegal anyways. as i understand it MANY manus have gone without paying all or some of the fees they owed. oooh but im sure none of us have any of those disks do we?

Doesn't matter. We bought the discs legally and in good faith. And yes, that is why Panorama is out of business. Didn't pay their fees.
I find it funny that everyone is so hard on the pirates that are hosts but almost nothing is mentioned about manus like Panorama.
They blame the host pirates for the demise of legitimate karaoke manus, but say nothing about the manu pirates and thier MAJOR contribution to the problem.
Could it be that a manu like Panorama not paying their fees might be unfair competition to a legitimate manu like Sound Choice, who pays their fees?
Something to think about.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:30 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Lonman @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:09 pm wrote:
supercharged @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:50 am wrote:
Im shocked that it never seems to come up that MOST karaoke is illegal anyways. as i understand it MANY manus have gone without paying all or some of the fees they owed. oooh but im sure none of us have any of those disks do we?


Doesn't matter on our end, as long as the clubs are paying the ASCAP/BMI fees, doesn't matter that the manus didn't properly license their end.


Would these be the same manufacturers that want everyone to join the KIAA.org and make sure that you're completely legal... but they don't have to be?

Would it be the same ones that want you to agree to sign away your rights and be subject to surprise "inspections" and agree to whatever "redress" they decide at the time?

Would this be the same manufacturers that don't have to prove anything, ever including what they produce to sell to you is legal????

My, my. What a tangled web we weave....


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:11 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Posts: 1889
Images: 1
Location: portland, oregon
Been Liked: 59 times
Single independent KJ's neednt worry about being popped. They are TOO SMALL POTATOES and they are the very market that the MFR's sell to.

Its the large scale multi-riggers and the illegal hardrive reproducers/sellers that have been busted with court judegments and senteces handed out.

A single KJ with a lappy or box is not a large enough target to waste the resources neccessary to prosecute.

They need not worry.

In addition the only harrassment/local legal action are aginst those venues not paying thier monthly ascap/bmi liscensing fees. And those they either cease having music entertainment or settle and make a payment schedule for thier liscenses.

_________________
"You know that I sing the Blues and I do not suffer fools. When I'm on that silver mic, it's gonna cut ya, just like a knife"-The SWINGCAT


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:28 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22975
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
c. staley @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:30 pm wrote:
Lonman @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:09 pm wrote:
supercharged @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:50 am wrote:
Im shocked that it never seems to come up that MOST karaoke is illegal anyways. as i understand it MANY manus have gone without paying all or some of the fees they owed. oooh but im sure none of us have any of those disks do we?


Doesn't matter on our end, as long as the clubs are paying the ASCAP/BMI fees, doesn't matter that the manus didn't properly license their end.


Would these be the same manufacturers that want everyone to join the KIAA.org and make sure that you're completely legal... but they don't have to be?

Would it be the same ones that want you to agree to sign away your rights and be subject to surprise "inspections" and agree to whatever "redress" they decide at the time?

Would this be the same manufacturers that don't have to prove anything, ever including what they produce to sell to you is legal????

My, my. What a tangled web we weave....


I don't know anything about that. If I own an original disc, I am fine as long as the club is paying their publishing fees.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:19 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Lonman said:
Quote:
I don't know anything about that. If I own an original disc, I am fine as long as the club is paying their publishing fees.


Are you suggesting that it doesn't matter if you're purchasing and using pirated material in your show long as the club is paying ASCAP, BMI and SEASAC?

You're talking apples and oranges Lonnie... You're talking about ASCAP (performance fees) and the subject is pirates and copyrights.

Just because a disc is purchased "at a store" and it's pressed, doesn't make it "legal"
does it? Apparently, that's exactly the kind of thinking that this KIAA wants you to believe...that you should not question a pressed disc... even if it is produced illegally.

SGB and Top Tunes were both pressed, as were All Hits, Helluva Disc, Mega Hits, Dangerous and so on.. yet none of those were "properly licensed." If you think that all of SC's tracks were licensed when they were produced and sold, you're fooling yourself.

The idea that a manufacturer wants to threaten KJ's if they "pirate the already pirated material" is a joke. And from the KJ's point of view it's like saying "Of course it's legal... I have a receipt from the thief."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:51 am 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm
Posts: 2674
Location: Jersey
Been Liked: 160 times
BarryKaraoke @ March 25th 2009, 1:28 pm wrote:
jamkaraoke @ Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:46 pm wrote:
SIMPLE - take out the LEAD VOCAL TRACK and add some synchronized lyrics -- I mean HOW HARD COULD IT BE ALREADY. Wouldn't you rather pay $2-3 per song if it was the original band??
Goodbye SOUNDCHOICE !!!


One of my favorite geeky underground artists, Jonathan Coulton, does this very thing. You can buy karaoke versions of almost all his songs on his website, complete with graphics. It's a brilliant idea actually...every artist could do it!

Off topic: Speaking of which...if you guys don't have Coulton's version of Baby Got Back, you should. It's the same lyrics, but done in an "Adult Contemporary" style. Very funny to sing. LINK


You talked me into it, Barry. I purchased Jonathan Coulton's karaoke version of baby Got Back and I recorded it and posted it on the singers showcase. LOL First of May will be my next song to record but I don't know if it will be allowed to stay on the Singers Showcase for very long, considering some of the language. Not even sure if I'll get away with singing it at a karaoke bar. ;c)


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:09 am 
The most interesting thing to me is how quickly Obama reacted, as suggested by one poster, to the needs of some big financial supporters. It's as if there's nothing else "on his plate", right?

Where this development will lead is subject to conjecture and it was considerate of JoeC to alert this forum of this newest development.

And at least we know Joe has good intentions, unlike that guy from Phoenix who tried to INTIMIDATE folks with misleading information a few years back about local venues becoming the target of law enforcement regarding copyright infringement

BTW is there any new info regarding Phoenix in regard to that "crackdown" which was going to be so ominous? Was any KJ's equipment ever seized in Phoenix?

As to seizures of Kiddie Porn, illicit drugs and the like KJ's ARE NOT DISPLAYING either. And since what KJ's and DJ's do is not inherently illegal, what would constitute "probable cause" when seizing their business assets? How would law enforcement know, in fact, that the seized equipment SHOULD be suspect? And does anyone really think that a local law enforcement officer would confiscate equipment, on their own (without directions from above)? And if directed from above, would such directions come down without a great deal of investigation beforehand and (likely) a search warrant?

And, Diafel, your concern about how your posts were read is well founded! There are posters who do not read posts in their entirety and/or who might not easily comprehend differing points of view and/or subtleties contained in a previous post. So, Diafel, you might soon be accused of being thick-headed by the very person who you feel missed your well-stated ideas!


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:54 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
BruceFan4Life @ Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:51 am wrote:
You talked me into it, Barry. I purchased Jonathan Coulton's karaoke version of baby Got Back and I recorded it and posted it on the singers showcase. LOL First of May will be my next song to record but I don't know if it will be allowed to stay on the Singers Showcase for very long, considering some of the language. Not even sure if I'll get away with singing it at a karaoke bar. ;c)


LOL. I hear ya. I recently did a private 30th birthday party and the VERY drunk crowd kept yelling for me to sing one, so I said "OK...one for the lovers" and did First of May. At first they were like, "What the heck is this this mellow song?"...until the chorus. They were rollin' on the floor! :P


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:59 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Thanks for the kind words, Eric. You hit it on the head- I was just passing on info, and have no opinion or idea what will come of it. I only HOPE it thins out pirate competitors, but we can only wait and see....

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22975
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
c. staley @ Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:19 pm wrote:
Lonman said:
Quote:
I don't know anything about that. If I own an original disc, I am fine as long as the club is paying their publishing fees.


Are you suggesting that it doesn't matter if you're purchasing and using pirated material in your show long as the club is paying ASCAP, BMI and SEASAC?

You're talking apples and oranges Lonnie... You're talking about ASCAP (performance fees) and the subject is pirates and copyrights.

Because I bought an original disc from a legitimate source, does not make me a pirate even if it wasn't made with proper licesning - that will fall on the manu, not the kj. If I bought it, it is fine to use in my show if the publishing fees are being paid - no different than cover bands playing material, they don't have to get any licensing to play the material, the clubs need to pay for the material being played.

Quote:
Just because a disc is purchased "at a store" and it's pressed, doesn't make it "legal"
does it? Apparently, that's exactly the kind of thinking that this KIAA wants you to believe...that you should not question a pressed disc... even if it is produced illegally.

I don't know anything about the kiaa, but if I bought it - original pressed disc from a legitimate outlet, then I can play it - regardless of which manu made it - legit or not, it will ultimately fall onto them as far as legalities. It's when I am creating discs from music, then I am breaking the copyright law. Publishing laws are different. I am just playing music, not creating it.
If that were the case, I would need to get rid of 75% of my library since much of the licensing to redistribute is no longer valid. But to play the music is a licensed club is not a problem.

Quote:
SGB and Top Tunes were both pressed, as were All Hits, Helluva Disc, Mega Hits, Dangerous and so on.. yet none of those were "properly licensed." If you think that all of SC's tracks were licensed when they were produced and sold, you're fooling yourself.

Never denied that they were all licesned. I use SC 8125 nightly. But the legalities are not on my regarding those discs.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:59 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Lonman said:
Quote:
I don't know anything about the kiaa, but if I bought it - original pressed disc from a legitimate outlet, then I can play it - regardless of which manu made it - legit or not, it will ultimately fall onto them as far as legalities. It's when I am creating discs from music, then I am breaking the copyright law. Publishing laws are different. I am just playing music, not creating it.


So what you're saying is that you really don't care if any music is illegally produced, illegally reproduced, illegally pressed on a disc as long as it's sold through "a legitimate outlet" then it somehow is "washed clean" of any illegalities and it's perfectly legal for you to use it?

Granted ASCAP/BMI/SEASAC really don't give a squat where you got the music from or how or who created the recording, that's not what they are about anyway.

And yes, any "redistribution license" ran out years ago on many of the older discs you have, so the manufacturer can no longer distribute the tracks in question (press & sell more discs), which has nothing to do with you being able to play them.

Quote:
no different than cover bands playing material, they don't have to get any licensing to play the material, the clubs need to pay for the material being played.

You're right: Cover bands don't have to get a license to play the material, they are creating the material on the spot, they are not mass producing it and reselling it. In your case with illegally produced tracks, you're purchasing the material that by all "legal means" shouldn't have been available for you to purchase in the first place.

And, you're simply taking the position that since you bought it from a store, it's now perfectly legal for you play right?
("I understand officer that the car was reported stolen... but I bought it from a store and that makes in "un-stolen" and now it's mine.")

Now you have to simply determine what constitutes a "legitimate outlet." Would purchasing from ProSing or Karaoke.com be considered legitimate although they also sold Dangerous, SGB, Top Tunes and a host of other illegally produced discs?

Maybe I should just purchase everything I want from our local "Disc Jockey Supply" store who regularly burn all these brands including original DK, Music Maestro, All hits, Top Tunes etc. and declare them "legal." I could show a receipt if you like.... does this make the redistribution of these expired licenses somehow legal again?

If I use your logic, I shouldn't have to worry about any tracks if I got them this way, I have a receipt from a store and whether they burn them or press them, it shouldn't matter.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:20 am 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm
Posts: 2674
Location: Jersey
Been Liked: 160 times
BarryKaraoke @ March 30th 2009, 9:54 am wrote:
BruceFan4Life @ Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:51 am wrote:
You talked me into it, Barry. I purchased Jonathan Coulton's karaoke version of baby Got Back and I recorded it and posted it on the singers showcase. LOL First of May will be my next song to record but I don't know if it will be allowed to stay on the Singers Showcase for very long, considering some of the language. Not even sure if I'll get away with singing it at a karaoke bar. ;c)


LOL. I hear ya. I recently did a private 30th birthday party and the VERY drunk crowd kept yelling for me to sing one, so I said "OK...one for the lovers" and did First of May. At first they were like, "What the heck is this this mellow song?"...until the chorus. They were rollin' on the floor! :P


I'll be posting First of May on the Singer's Showcase later today, Barry. Keep an eye out.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mrscott and 561 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech